SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)

On quality, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) leads (52.6 vs 51.8). On price, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) is cheaper ($0.11 vs $0.11 per 1M). In real production usage, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is used more (rank #1 vs #4 of 291). Across 19 real task categories where both models have classified traffic, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 handles more of the traffic in 18 of them.

  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)
Quality (Intelligence Index)51.8 / 52.6
Price ($/1M blended)$0.11 / $0.11
Average usage share12.91% / 5.54%
Best provider uptime100.0% / 100.0%
Coding index69.1 / 68.8
Agentic index48.4 / 45.7
Context window1,048,576 / 1,048,576
Quality per dollar460.4 pts/$ / 489.3 pts/$

Head-to-head by real task

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads 18 of 19 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) leads 1. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)
Web Search34.1%2.9%
Tool Dispatch28.1%2.8%
Multi-step Planning25.1%3.9%
Research & Reports22.6%3.5%
DevOps23.0%4.4%
DevOps & Config23.0%6.2%
Q&A & Knowledge20.2%3.6%
Workflow Execution20.7%4.9%
File I/O20.1%5.0%
SQL & Database19.8%6.6%
Math17.1%3.9%
Repo Scanning19.5%6.6%
Finance & Trading18.3%5.6%
Code Generation19.7%7.2%
Security Audit22.8%11.0%
Shell Execution14.5%5.8%
Debugging18.5%10.6%
Frontend & UI17.2%9.7%
Code Review17.3%23.8%

Usage share over time

23.98%17.99%11.99%6.00%0.00%Share of usageJul 5Jul 22Aug 8
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): which is better quality?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (52.6 vs 51.8).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): which is cheaper?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) is cheaper at $0.11/1M vs $0.11/1M.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): which is used more?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #1 vs #4 of 291).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): which wins more real-world task categories?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 handles more traffic in 18 of 19 shared task categories where both models have classified OpenRouter usage.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 9, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.