SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Tencent: Hy3 preview

On quality, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads (51.8 vs 42.2). On price, Tencent: Hy3 preview is cheaper ($0.10 vs $0.11 per 1M). In real production usage, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is used more (rank #1 vs #8 of 291).

  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • Tencent: Hy3 preview
Quality (Intelligence Index)51.8 / 42.2
Price ($/1M blended)$0.11 / $0.10
Average usage share12.91% / 2.60%
Coding index69.1 / 58.8
Agentic index48.4 / 31.4
Context window1,048,576 / 262,144
Quality per dollar460.4 pts/$ / 423.1 pts/$

Usage share over time

23.98%17.99%11.99%6.00%0.00%Share of usageJul 5Jul 22Aug 8
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • Tencent: Hy3 preview

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Tencent: Hy3 preview: which is better quality?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (51.8 vs 42.2).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Tencent: Hy3 preview: which is cheaper?

Tencent: Hy3 preview is cheaper at $0.10/1M vs $0.11/1M.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Tencent: Hy3 preview: which is used more?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #1 vs #8 of 291).

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 9, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.