Real data comparison
Tencent: Hy3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
On price, Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper ($0.23 vs $0.44 per 1M). In real production usage, Tencent: Hy3 is used more (rank #3 vs #11 of 291). Across 6 real task categories where both models have classified traffic, Tencent: Hy3 handles more of the traffic in 6 of them.
- Tencent: Hy3
- StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Head-to-head by real task
Tencent: Hy3 leads 6 of 6 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash leads 0. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.
| Task | Tencent: Hy3 | StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| File I/O | 13.7% | 2.9% |
| Frontend & UI | 7.4% | 2.6% |
| DevOps | 8.9% | 4.4% |
| DevOps & Config | 6.3% | 2.8% |
| Shell Execution | 6.0% | 3.1% |
| SQL & Database | 3.1% | 2.6% |
Usage share over time
- Tencent: Hy3
- StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Frequently asked questions
Tencent: Hy3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash: which is better quality?
Quality data is unavailable for one or both models.
Tencent: Hy3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash: which is cheaper?
Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper at $0.23/1M vs $0.44/1M.
Tencent: Hy3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash: which is used more?
Tencent: Hy3 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #3 vs #11 of 291).
Tencent: Hy3 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash: which wins more real-world task categories?
Tencent: Hy3 handles more traffic in 6 of 6 shared task categories where both models have classified OpenRouter usage.
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 9, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.